SullysBlog

Domain investing tips, strategies, and industry insights

Advertisement
Grit Brokerage
Advertisement
Infinite Designs, Inc.
Advertisement
AGT
Advertisement
NotRenewing.com
Domainers Are Too Good at Explaining Why a Name Could Sell

Domainers Are Too Good at Explaining Why a Name Could Sell

One thing I think domainers get really good at, maybe too good at, is explaining why a name could sell.

On the surface, that sounds like a good skill to have. If you can look at a domain and explain who might buy it, how they might use it, and why it has some value, then you are probably doing more than just guessing.

And that is true to a point.

But I also think this is one of the traps in domaining.


Before you drop those names, take your last shot and list them on NotRenewing.com to get $99!


After you have been around domain names long enough, you can build a case for almost anything. You can take a name and come up with a few possible industries, a couple of startup ideas, maybe a similar sale or two, and suddenly the name starts to feel stronger than it really is.

Not because the logic is completely wrong. Sometimes the logic makes sense.

The problem is that a good explanation is not the same thing as real demand.

I have done this with my own names. I will look at a domain and think, “This would be perfect for a fintech company,” or “This could work for an AI tool,” or “This would make sense for a healthcare startup.” And maybe it would. But that does not mean anyone in those spaces is actually looking for that name, using that language, or willing to pay for it.

That is the part that gets tricky.

A name can be usable and still not be very sellable.

A name can have a purpose and still not have much of a buyer pool.

A name can make sense once you explain it, and still not be strong enough for someone else to care.

I think a lot of us confuse possible use with probable sale. Those are very different things.

Possible use is easy. Almost every halfway decent name can be used for something. If you stare at it long enough, you can probably find a company, product, app, newsletter, agency, or side project that could use it.

Probable sale is harder.

That means there are actual buyers who understand the term, value the name, have a reason to upgrade, and are willing to spend money on it. That is a much higher bar.

This is where we can fool ourselves a little.

We buy a name because we see potential. Then a year goes by. Then another year. Maybe no inquiries. Maybe a low offer. Maybe nothing at all. Instead of questioning the name, we improve the explanation.

Now it is not just a general business name. It is a SaaS name. Then it is an AI name. Then it is a marketplace name. Then it is a consulting brand. The domain did not change, but the story around it keeps getting better.

At some point, I think you have to ask whether the domain is actually gaining value or whether the explanation is doing all the heavy lifting.

That is not always an easy thing to admit, because explaining a domain feels like conviction. It feels like research. It feels like you are seeing something other people are missing.

And sometimes you are.

There are plenty of names that need patience. There are names where the right buyer just has not come along yet. I am not saying every name that sits is a bad name. That would be ridiculous.

But I do think we should be honest about how often we defend names simply because we already own them.

A buyer usually does not care about the same explanation we give ourselves. They are not sitting there thinking about how clever our thesis is. They either see the fit or they do not. They either have a problem the name solves, or it becomes one more decent option they forget about.

That is why one of the best questions is still the simplest one:

Would I buy this domain today if I did not already own it?

Not, can I explain it?

Not, could someone use it?

Not, did I like it three years ago?

Would I buy it today, with fresh eyes, using the same standards I would apply to someone else’s portfolio?

That question cuts through a lot.

Because imagination is important in domaining. You need it. If you cannot see potential before others do, you probably will not do very well.

But imagination can also keep you renewing names that only work inside your own argument.

Sometimes the domain is good.

Sometimes the explanation is better than the domain.

Share:

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email will not be published.

No comments yet.

Be the first to share your thoughts!